PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
67.97%
Cash & equivalents growing 67.97% while SA's declined -70.46%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.97%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SA's 2.09%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-9.10%
Receivables growth less than half of SA's 87.34%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.32%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
65.38%
≥ 1.5x SA's 6.32%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-1.56%
Below half SA's 4.69%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.37%
Below half of SA's -5.11%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.48%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.71%
Similar yoy growth to SA's 4.53%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48%
≥ 1.5x SA's 4.88%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
9430.97%
Less than half of SA's -41.20%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SA and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-105.77%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.75%
Less than half of SA's -40.82%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-8.33%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Less than half of SA's -44.11%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.08%
Less than half of SA's -42.94%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Less than half of SA's -41.42%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.07%
Similar yoy to SA's 23.65%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
89.71%
Similar yoy to SA's 107.53%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.37%
≥ 1.5x SA's 7.43%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
11.48%
≥ 1.5x SA's 4.88%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
83.37%
≥ 1.5x SA's 5.96%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-6.25%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-128.19%
Less than half of SA's 70.46%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.