PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
70.88%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SA's 200.15%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.88%
Below half of SA's -38.56%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
58.62%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.02%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
67.74%
Below half of SA's -36.81%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.83%
Below half SA's 6.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.39%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.07%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.58%
Below half of SA's 6.46%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Below half of SA's 0.71%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-8.88%
Less than half of SA's 48.94%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.68%
Both SA and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-106.99%
1.25-1.5x SA's -80.32%. Martin Whitman sees a potentially higher near-term liability load.
-2.70%
Less than half of SA's -13.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.00%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.79%
Less than half of SA's -19.39%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
18.54%
Less than half of SA's 502.30%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-8.65%
50-75% of SA's -16.67%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
50-75% of SA's -15.42%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
3.07%
Above 1.5x SA's 0.15%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
2.94%
Similar yoy to SA's 2.86%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
36.73%
Less than half of SA's 85.37%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SA's -100.00%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
3.21%
≥ 1.5x SA's 1.91%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
0.06%
Below half SA's 0.71%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
21.39%
Below half SA's -48.57%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.00%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.62%
Less than half of SA's -200.15%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.