PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
67.39%
Cash & equivalents growing 67.39% while SA's declined -51.09%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.39%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SA's 33.43%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-64.69%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of SA's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-66.48%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
58.69%
≥ 1.5x SA's 6.77%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
0.78%
Below half SA's 5.87%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.30%
Both SA and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.52%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.21%
Below half of SA's 5.83%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.13%
Below half of SA's 5.91%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-28.47%
Less than half of SA's 105.42%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-11.05%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.17%
Both SA and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
61.27%
Exceeding 1.5x SA's 8.58%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-22.38%
Less than half of SA's 51.25%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.03%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.17%
1.25-1.5x SA's 30.78%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier DTL expansions.
17.60%
50-75% of SA's 26.56%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
0.09%
Less than half of SA's 26.56%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.35%
Less than half of SA's 35.10%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
7.38%
Above 1.5x SA's 4.01%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-1.06%
Below half SA's -3.87%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-614.98%
Less than half of SA's 115.56%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-7.38%
Less than half of SA's 4.65%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
2.86%
0.5-0.75x SA's 4.16%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
2.13%
Below half SA's 5.91%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-35.30%
Below half SA's 40.38%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.03%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.89%
Less than half of SA's 51.09%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.