PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
40.93%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x SA's 19.65%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.93%
Below half of SA's -23.53%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-45.82%
Receivables growth 50-75% of SA's -62.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.52%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
31.77%
Below half of SA's -24.10%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-5.29%
Below half SA's 1.16%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.30%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.13%
Less than half of SA's -289.28%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-4.73%
Below half of SA's 1.16%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
≥ 1.5x SA's -0.87%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-10.38%
Less than half of SA's -70.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.20%
Less than half of SA's -43.20%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.84%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.59%
Above 1.5x SA's 10.56%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
79.20%
Above 1.5x SA's 0.04%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-9.75%
Less than half of SA's 9.21%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.76%
Similar yoy to SA's -9.71%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
0.21%
Less than half of SA's 0.72%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-11.62%
≥ 1.5x SA's -5.13%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
3.65%
Less than half of SA's 173.48%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.31%
≥ 1.5x SA's -0.12%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-4.25%
≥ 1.5x SA's -0.87%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
14.30%
Below half SA's -29.01%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.84%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.36%
50-75% of SA's -19.65%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.