95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-12.71%
Cash & equivalents declining -12.71% while SAND's grows 87.30%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.71%
Below half of SAND's 26.30%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
24.60%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 18.98%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
10.87%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.46%
Below half of SAND's 21.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-10.85%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.87%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.79%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.61%
Below half of SAND's -0.09%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.90%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
4.60%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.77%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.62%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.60%
Less than half of SAND's -3.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-4.60%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.62%
Less than half of SAND's -3.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Below half SAND's 8.83%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.98%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.45%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
5.90%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.71%
Less than half of SAND's -8.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.