95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.85%
Cash & equivalents declining -3.85% while SAND's grows 87.30%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Below half of SAND's 26.30%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.50%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 18.98%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.03%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
1.25-1.5x SAND's 72.55%. Martin Whitman worries about added complexity or intangible expansions.
4.17%
Below half of SAND's 21.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.58%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.87%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.35%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.35%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
Less than half of SAND's 21.85%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.91%
Below half of SAND's -0.09%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.74%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
6.85%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Less than half of SAND's -9.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Less than half of SAND's -3.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-6.85%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.85%
Less than half of SAND's -3.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.48%
Below half SAND's 8.83%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-5.35%
Less than half of SAND's 763.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.49%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 1.45%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.74%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.85%
Less than half of SAND's -8.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.