PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-62.40%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-62.40% vs SAND's -7.76%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.40%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's -7.76%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-83.67%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 111.29%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.17%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's 314.29%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-62.91%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -7.04%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.98%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-6.98%
Below half of SAND's -14.16%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -7.74%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
-31.58%
Less than half of SAND's 663.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-6.06%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SAND and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-34.01%
Less than half of SAND's 663.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-28.93%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.93%
Less than half of SAND's 663.71%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.42%
Less than half of SAND's 663.71%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Below half SAND's -297.46%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-126.02%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
Below half SAND's -19.14%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-8.63%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -7.74%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.61%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.82%
Less than half of SAND's 7.76%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.