PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-48.38%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-48.38% vs SAND's -24.90%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.38%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's -24.90%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
284.08%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -5.81%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.93%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's -65.52%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-39.70%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -24.69%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.85%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.86%
Below half of SAND's -13.51%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Below half of SAND's -23.66%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
47.41%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
6.45%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.12%
Less than half of SAND's -74.24%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
5.86%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.86%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.53%
Less than half of SAND's -74.24%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.14%
Below half SAND's 2.88%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
100.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.23%
Below half SAND's -15.54%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.32%
Below half SAND's -23.66%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.91%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.09%
Less than half of SAND's 24.90%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.