PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
81.69%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SAND's 2488.08%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.69%
Below half of SAND's 2488.08%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
220.52%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SAND's 28.15%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.96%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
84.04%
Below half of SAND's 2334.78%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
11.34%
Below half SAND's 956234.00%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.79%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.37%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
11.61%
Below half of SAND's 6770.35%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.22%
Below half of SAND's 3525.49%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
133.68%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.77%
Less than half of SAND's 59.22%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-5.55%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.55%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.32%
Less than half of SAND's 59.22%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.65%
Below half SAND's 470.88%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
86.71%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.42%
Below half SAND's 4936.98%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
13.22%
Below half SAND's 3525.49%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
18.79%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-4.54%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-22.23%
Less than half of SAND's -2488.08%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.