PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-25.35%
Cash & equivalents declining -25.35% while SAND's grows 85.54%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Below half of SAND's 85.54%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-11.21%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 267.64%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.97%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-24.93%
Below half of SAND's 84.13%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.46%
Below half SAND's 71.25%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.19%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.75%
Below half of SAND's 68.77%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Below half of SAND's 76.05%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
213.41%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-83.08%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SAND and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-44.56%
Above 1.5x SAND's -10.44%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-6.25%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.93%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.34%
Above 1.5x SAND's -10.44%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.34%
Below half SAND's -64.46%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
68.80%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
Below half SAND's 77.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.72%
Below half SAND's 76.05%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
48.19%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-52.05%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-321.65%
Above 1.5x SAND's -85.54%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.