PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-20.97%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-20.97% vs SAND's -6.38%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.97%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's -6.38%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-1.44%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 29.72%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.12%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-20.69%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -6.38%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-0.26%
Below half SAND's 4.65%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.70%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.18%
Less than half of SAND's -54.95%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.59%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 4.59%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.17%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-20.57%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-8.22%
Less than half of SAND's 18.65%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-6.76%
Less than half of SAND's 18.65%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-7.69%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.85%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-38.98%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.27%
Less than half of SAND's 18.65%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.67%
Below half SAND's -43.38%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
90.33%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.97%
Below half SAND's -0.20%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.67%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.17%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
59.70%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-5.88%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
30.07%
Above 1.5x SAND's 6.38%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.