PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
67.97%
Cash & equivalents growing 67.97% while SAND's declined -6.09%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.97%
Below half of SAND's -6.09%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-9.10%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 588.78%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.32%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
65.38%
Below half of SAND's -5.75%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.56%
Below half SAND's 126.58%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.37%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.48%
Less than half of SAND's 67.95%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.71%
Below half of SAND's 132.04%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48%
Below half of SAND's 76.00%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9430.97%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SAND and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-105.77%
Similar yoy changes to SAND's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-4.75%
Less than half of SAND's 531.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-8.33%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.08%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Less than half of SAND's 531.09%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.07%
Below half SAND's 494.14%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
89.71%
Less than half of SAND's -0.36%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.37%
Below half SAND's 75.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
11.48%
Below half SAND's 76.00%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
83.37%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-6.25%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-128.19%
Less than half of SAND's 6.09%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.