PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
24.34%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SAND's 115.27%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.34%
Below half of SAND's 115.27%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.48%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 1672.00%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.05%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
24.13%
Below half of SAND's 165.87%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.53%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -0.90%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.37%
Both SAND and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.39%
Less than half of SAND's 268.68%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-4.03%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.64%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 3.00%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.12%
Less than half of SAND's -6.72%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.99%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.68%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.78%
Less than half of SAND's -6.72%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Less than half of SAND's -6.72%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.99%
0.75-0.9x SAND's 39.06%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
-67.14%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-68.29%
50-75% of SAND's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer expansions in these equity lines.
2.25%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 3.07%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
1.82%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 3.00%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-30.37%
Both SAND and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-7.14%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-31.12%
Less than half of SAND's -115.27%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.