PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
2.03%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SAND's 80.50%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.03%
Below half of SAND's 80.50%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
39.73%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -84.20%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.77%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.47%
Below half of SAND's 47.58%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.50%
Below half SAND's 3.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Both SAND and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-40.25%
Above 1.5x SAND's -19.00%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-2.84%
50-75% of SAND's -5.12%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
-3.06%
Below half of SAND's 4.97%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Below half of SAND's 7.37%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.23%
Less than half of SAND's 25.10%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-11.10%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-70.03%
Less than half of SAND's 25.10%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.12%
Less than half of SAND's 25.10%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.82%
Below half SAND's 124.40%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-107.84%
Above 1.5x SAND's -4.65%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
-113.76%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.40%
Below half SAND's 7.25%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.66%
Below half SAND's 7.37%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-27.04%
Both SAND and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-7.69%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.52%
Less than half of SAND's -80.50%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.