95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
18.72%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of SAND's 161.39%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.72%
Below half of SAND's 161.39%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
59.82%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 153.85%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.42%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
18.90%
Below half of SAND's 166.49%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.78%
Below half SAND's -3.16%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.62%
Below half of SAND's -41.59%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-67.67%
Similar yoy growth to SAND's -80.71%. Walter Schloss sees comparable tax asset changes or loss usage.
-1.67%
Less than half of SAND's 6.62%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.29%
Below half of SAND's -5.55%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 9.23%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-21.21%
50-75% of SAND's -40.05%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
18.98%
Less than half of SAND's -40.05%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-14.26%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.26%
Less than half of SAND's -40.05%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.35%
Less than half of SAND's -40.05%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.81%
Below half SAND's 76.91%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-176.79%
Above 1.5x SAND's -7.73%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.10%
Below half SAND's 9.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
4.65%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 9.23%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-6.62%
Below half SAND's -41.59%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.08%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-21.59%
Less than half of SAND's -161.39%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.