PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
10.49%
Cash & equivalents growing 10.49% while SAND's declined -26.58%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.49%
Below half of SAND's -26.58%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-4.66%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 6127.27%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.29%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.47%
Below half of SAND's -14.98%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.03%
Below half SAND's 14.94%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.21%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -34.99%. Martin Whitman warns that the firm may be missing strategic opportunities.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to SAND's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees comparable tax asset changes or loss usage.
-4.22%
Less than half of SAND's 49.38%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.71%
Below half of SAND's 12.42%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.70%
Below half of SAND's 6.68%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
90.43%
Above 1.5x SAND's 15.40%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.83%
Less than half of SAND's 815.40%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-16.64%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.49%
Less than half of SAND's -62.60%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.65%
Less than half of SAND's 852.80%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.53%
Below half SAND's 52.01%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-751.16%
Above 1.5x SAND's -1.28%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
-157.97%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.96%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 4.14%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
1.70%
Below half SAND's 6.68%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-24.21%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -34.99%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
-9.99%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.07%
Less than half of SAND's 26.58%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.