PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-49.64%
Cash & equivalents declining -49.64% while SAND's grows 314.97%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.64%
Below half of SAND's 314.97%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
51.09%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 367.13%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.16%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-49.06%
Below half of SAND's 314.73%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
26.71%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 39.62%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.62%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 72.31%. Martin Whitman warns that the firm may be missing strategic opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Less than half of SAND's -41.18%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
27.46%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 41.00%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Below half of SAND's 86.71%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-12.44%
Less than half of SAND's 63.60%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.58%
Less than half of SAND's 8.02%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-19.96%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4675.41%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.96%
Less than half of SAND's 404.81%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.50%
Less than half of SAND's 3.78%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.95%
Below half SAND's 31.48%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
108.47%
Above 1.5x SAND's 40.80%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
232.50%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.60%
Below half SAND's 88.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.34%
Below half SAND's 86.71%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
40.62%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 72.31%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
-11.10%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
52.03%
Less than half of SAND's -314.97%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.