95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-52.00%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-52.00% vs SAND's -2.96%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.00%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's -2.96%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-44.55%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 136.65%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.71%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of SAND's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
-52.72%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -5.02%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
2.10%
Below half SAND's -2.85%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.97%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -24.72%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.49%
Less than half of SAND's -62.12%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.97%
Below half of SAND's -6.38%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.10%
Below half of SAND's -6.05%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
1.40%
Less than half of SAND's 13.45%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.70%
Exceeding 1.5x SAND's -0.27%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-98.15%
Less than half of SAND's 8.12%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.04%
Less than half of SAND's -15.68%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
1110.27%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8513.60%
Less than half of SAND's -15.68%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
Less than half of SAND's -10.21%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.36%
Less than half of SAND's 10.67%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
2.07%
Below half SAND's -108.40%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-156.99%
Above 1.5x SAND's -64.88%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
-0.36%
Less than half of SAND's -10.67%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
-0.27%
Below half SAND's -4.77%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.10%
Below half SAND's -6.05%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-48.97%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -24.72%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
4.84%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.08%
Above 1.5x SAND's 2.96%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.