PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
70.88%
Cash & equivalents growing 70.88% while SAND's declined -0.48%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.88%
Below half of SAND's -0.48%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
58.62%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -71.52%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.02%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
67.74%
Below half of SAND's -5.69%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.83%
Below half SAND's 0.03%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.39%
Below half of SAND's -6.10%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.07%
Similar yoy growth to SAND's -4.01%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
-0.58%
Below half of SAND's 2.61%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Below half of SAND's 0.56%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-8.88%
Less than half of SAND's 33.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-156.68%
Both SAND and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-106.99%
Less than half of SAND's 3.41%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-2.70%
Less than half of SAND's 22.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.00%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.79%
Less than half of SAND's -15.59%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
18.54%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.65%
50-75% of SAND's -15.59%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
Above 1.5x SAND's -4.94%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
3.07%
Above 1.5x SAND's 1.87%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
2.94%
Below half SAND's -117.75%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
36.73%
Less than half of SAND's -15.20%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SAND's -1.87%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
3.21%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.57%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
0.06%
Below half SAND's 0.56%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
21.39%
Below half SAND's -6.10%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.00%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.62%
Less than half of SAND's 0.48%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.