95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
54.66%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x SAND's 5.71%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.66%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's 5.71%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-38.02%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SAND's -5.03%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-100.00%
Similar inventory growth to SAND's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
-4.36%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
46.66%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 3.80%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-0.53%
Below half SAND's -19.23%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.42%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -8.03%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.88%
Less than half of SAND's -17.84%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.94%
Below half of SAND's -13.89%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Below half of SAND's -9.78%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.51%
Less than half of SAND's -13.44%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-32.01%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.08%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1182.14%
Exceeding 1.5x SAND's -2.09%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
1.26%
Less than half of SAND's -10.01%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-4.02%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.30%
Above 1.5x SAND's -10.43%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-76.74%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.21%
Less than half of SAND's -10.43%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.09%
Less than half of SAND's -10.28%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.00%
Less than half of SAND's 6.61%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
4.25%
Below half SAND's -932.50%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-155.36%
Less than half of SAND's 0.30%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.39%
Below half SAND's -0.73%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.20%
Below half SAND's -9.78%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-30.42%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -8.03%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-4.02%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.74%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -5.71%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.