95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-71.44%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-71.44% vs SAND's -57.53%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.44%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x SAND's -57.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
-28.08%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 51.89%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.71%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-72.90%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -54.30%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
20.38%
1.25-1.5x SAND's 18.32%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.47%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -11.66%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.52%
Less than half of SAND's -0.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
20.12%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 13.18%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.35%
Below half of SAND's -1.37%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.46%
Less than half of SAND's 13.08%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
142.39%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
1425.22%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
138.61%
Above 1.5x SAND's 13.08%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-19.88%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.88%
Above 1.5x SAND's -9.35%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-54.08%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-20.03%
Above 1.5x SAND's -9.35%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.51%
Above 1.5x SAND's -0.80%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
38.15%
Less than half of SAND's -0.11%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
1.80%
Below half SAND's 4.62%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-27.31%
Similar yoy to SAND's -35.67%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
-38.15%
Less than half of SAND's 0.11%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
22.01%
Below half SAND's -1.39%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
13.35%
Below half SAND's -1.37%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-23.47%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -11.66%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-19.88%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.12%
Less than half of SAND's 57.53%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.