PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
28.30%
Cash & equivalents growing 28.30% while SAND's declined -88.51%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.30%
Below half of SAND's -88.51%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-43.68%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's 0.36%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Similar inventory growth to SAND's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
-16.95%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.92%
Below half of SAND's -81.69%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
12.23%
Below half SAND's 48.34%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.65%
Below half of SAND's -23.68%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.86%
Less than half of SAND's -1.61%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
12.21%
Below half of SAND's 36.29%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.44%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 21.73%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-30.78%
Less than half of SAND's 92.38%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
15.60%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.60%
Both SAND and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-15.60%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-26.30%
Less than half of SAND's 92.38%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
126.58%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.03%
Less than half of SAND's -31.23%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
18.68%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
126.23%
Less than half of SAND's 1720.03%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.33%
Less than half of SAND's 990.91%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.09%
Less than half of SAND's 6.99%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-12.45%
Below half SAND's -69.39%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
13.50%
Less than half of SAND's -16.83%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.42%
Below half SAND's 0.78%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
12.44%
0.5-0.75x SAND's 21.73%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
12.65%
Below half SAND's -23.68%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
126.58%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
140.55%
50-75% of SAND's 268.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.