95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-1.00%
Cash & equivalents declining -1.00% while SAND's grows 113.36%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.00%
Below half of SAND's 113.36%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-20.14%
Similar receivables growth to SAND's -19.91%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-36.55%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.05%
Below half of SAND's 52.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.57%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -2.08%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.15%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -11.74%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a stronger commitment to long-horizon returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.05%
Less than half of SAND's 1.81%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.74%
Similar yoy growth to SAND's -2.92%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.73%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.02%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
50.24%
Less than half of SAND's -3.27%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-94.09%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.22%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
94.09%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.00%
Less than half of SAND's -3.27%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-11.30%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.43%
Less than half of SAND's -0.96%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-28.10%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.34%
Above 1.5x SAND's -0.96%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.97%
Above 1.5x SAND's -2.28%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.10%
Less than half of SAND's -0.04%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-1.07%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.05%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-16.53%
Less than half of SAND's -102.69%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.47%
Below half SAND's -1.01%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.73%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.02%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-16.15%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -11.74%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if robust new investments are prudent.
-11.30%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.36%
Less than half of SAND's -113.36%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.