95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-7.68%
Cash & equivalents declining -7.68% while SAND's grows 49.47%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.68%
Below half of SAND's 65.13%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
43.26%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SAND's 14.65%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.52%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.72%
Below half of SAND's 53.16%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.06%
Below half SAND's -2.30%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.52%
Below half of SAND's 57.54%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.02%
Less than half of SAND's -92.44%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.98%
Below half of SAND's 0.10%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Below half of SAND's 2.89%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-23.76%
Above 1.5x SAND's -1.70%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-50.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
13655.26%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
135.03%
Less than half of SAND's -1.70%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-10.81%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.76%
Less than half of SAND's -2.77%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-44.98%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.83%
Above 1.5x SAND's -2.77%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
Above 1.5x SAND's -2.16%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.04%
Similar yoy changes to SAND's 0.04%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital-raising strategies.
2.11%
Below half SAND's 19.52%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
7.86%
Less than half of SAND's 83.53%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
Below half SAND's 2.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.10%
Below half SAND's 2.89%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
5.52%
Below half SAND's 63.01%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-10.81%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.18%
Less than half of SAND's -49.47%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.