PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-33.27%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-33.27% vs SAND's -85.74%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.27%
Below half of SAND's -87.09%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
13.77%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -9.18%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.12%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-30.87%
Below half of SAND's 47.42%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.10%
Below half SAND's -3.09%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.20%
Below half of SAND's -15.26%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.03%
Less than half of SAND's 78.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.89%
Below half of SAND's -4.97%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.87%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-17.07%
Less than half of SAND's 53.63%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-74.51%
Less than half of SAND's 53.63%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-10.43%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.92%
Above 1.5x SAND's -7.13%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
15.55%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.43%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -7.13%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier future burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.02%
Less than half of SAND's 27.42%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.29%
Less than half of SAND's -0.00%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
2.50%
Below half SAND's -6.65%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
13.38%
Less than half of SAND's -294.11%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Above 1.5x SAND's 0.00%. Michael Burry suspects a significant bump in 'other' equity items vs. competitor.
1.10%
Below half SAND's -1.26%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.47%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.87%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
18.20%
Below half SAND's -18.11%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-10.43%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.67%
Less than half of SAND's 85.74%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.