PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-8.70%
Cash & equivalents declining -8.70% while SAND's grows 33.19%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.70%
Below half of SAND's 300.09%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
56.16%
Receivables growth above 1.5x SAND's 10.51%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
19.02%
Other current assets growth < half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-4.98%
Below half of SAND's -59.09%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.06%
≥ 1.5x SAND's -0.45%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
Below half of SAND's 200.05%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.19%
Less than half of SAND's -29.91%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.95%
Below half of SAND's 33.00%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
Below half of SAND's 22.29%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
18.42%
Less than half of SAND's -15.05%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.42%
Less than half of SAND's -15.05%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-10.39%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.09%
Less than half of SAND's -1.82%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.48%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.38%
Above 1.5x SAND's -1.82%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.04%
Similar yoy to SAND's -10.89%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
0.22%
Less than half of SAND's 19.25%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
1.49%
Below half SAND's 15.59%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
9.85%
Less than half of SAND's 114.84%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
Below half SAND's 22.88%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.01%
Below half SAND's 22.29%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
7.04%
Below half SAND's 214.96%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-10.39%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.54%
Less than half of SAND's -33.19%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.