PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-36.53%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-36.53% vs SAND's -47.14%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.53%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x SAND's -1.63%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
118.02%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -19.05%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.76%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-35.27%
Below half of SAND's 1.79%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.07%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -1.96%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.18%
Below half of SAND's 10.45%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Less than half of SAND's 41.31%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.12%
Below half of SAND's 2.05%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Below half of SAND's 2.04%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
48.98%
Above 1.5x SAND's 3.66%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
185.90%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25368.18%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
88.27%
Above 1.5x SAND's 3.66%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-8.44%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.28%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
4.72%
Less than half of SAND's -12.37%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
75.66%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.26%
50-75% of SAND's -12.37%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
Less than half of SAND's 1.93%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.59%
Less than half of SAND's -1.14%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-1.97%
Below half SAND's 12.49%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-26.47%
Less than half of SAND's 17.04%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.29%
Below half SAND's 2.04%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.76%
Below half SAND's 2.04%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-2.18%
Below half SAND's 12.88%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-8.44%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.78%
Less than half of SAND's 51.72%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.