95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
59.25%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0.75-0.9x SAND's 71.58%. Bill Ackman might demand clarity on why growth lags the competitor's liquidity build.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.25%
Cash + STI yoy 0.75-0.9x SAND's 70.31%. Bill Ackman would wonder if competitor is building liquidity more aggressively.
144.82%
Receivables growth less than half of SAND's -11.97%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.77%
1.25-1.5x SAND's -67.96%. Martin Whitman worries about added complexity or intangible expansions.
23.03%
Below half of SAND's 50.75%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.10%
0.5-0.75x SAND's -2.06%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.94%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-3.35%
Below half of SAND's -7.73%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
2.94%
Less than half of SAND's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-35.47%
Less than half of SAND's 38.59%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.42%
Below half of SAND's -4.85%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.70%
Below half of SAND's 0.21%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
77.41%
Less than half of SAND's -2.60%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
32.11%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
-99.69%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-44.62%
Above 1.5x SAND's -2.60%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-23.89%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.32%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.75%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
71.07%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to SAND's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-22.70%
Less than half of SAND's 17.51%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.72%
Less than half of SAND's 5.05%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.33%
Above 1.5x SAND's 0.16%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
7.30%
Below half SAND's 107.36%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.09%
Less than half of SAND's -7.08%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.48%
≥ 1.5x SAND's 0.14%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-0.70%
Below half SAND's 0.21%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-3.35%
Below half SAND's -7.69%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-23.76%
Less than half of SAND's 17.51%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-45.10%
50-75% of SAND's -75.73%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.