PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-413.39%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 55.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
38.48%
D&A growth well above AEM's 38.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-203.85%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-120.35%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 73.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-120.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -94.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-396.66%
Both negative yoy, with AEM at -164.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
1.52%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -359.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.94%
Growth of 21.94% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
21.32%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 0.26%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AEM is 7791.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.