PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -97.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.50%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 27.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-900.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AEM stands at 168.46%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-55.35%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -6.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
204.75%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -458.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while AEM is negative at -81.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-163.11%
Negative yoy while AEM is 62.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.42%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -45.99%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
62.15%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases well above AEM's 89.07%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AEM at -94.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
5292.00%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -4.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
140.21%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 2.52%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while AEM is negative at -1701.10%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -36.25%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
95.53%
Buyback growth of 95.53% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.