95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 294.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-6.27%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 8.45%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-3.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AEM stands at 2988.26%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
57.81%
SBC growth well above AEM's 8.80%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-192.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -724.79%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-221.04%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AEM at -139.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.93%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -3.37%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
180.21%
Growth well above AEM's 41.72%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-97.60%
Both negative yoy, with AEM at -53.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-5.26%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
99.69%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 17.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.51%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -501.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
97.31%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 33.28%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
93.27%
We repay more while AEM is negative at -1398.49%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.