PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -64.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
66.29%
D&A growth well above AEM's 15.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-104.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-72.78%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -30.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
854.67%
Well above AEM's 206.52% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-85.24%
AR is negative yoy while AEM is 101.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
AP growth well above AEM's 277.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-3700.00%
Negative yoy usage while AEM is 42.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-95.51%
Negative yoy while AEM is 50.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.62%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of AEM's 31.29%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
99.88%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -34.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 156.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
99.43%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -93.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
91.50%
We repay more while AEM is negative at -20.96%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AEM is 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.