PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
124.21%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 278.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.94%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -7.32%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
68.61%
Well above AEM's 53.91% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
58.28%
SBC growth well above AEM's 38.91%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-322.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -177.36%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-189.44%
AR is negative yoy while AEM is 214.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-637.34%
Both negative yoy AP, with AEM at -308.32%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-204.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -106.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-99.59%
Negative yoy while AEM is 54.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-14.72%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
99.97%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 24.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.73%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -99.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
99.90%
Investing outflow well above AEM's 7.07%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-352.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AEM is 34.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-332.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while AEM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.