PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-79.93%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AEM at -2408.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.87%
Some D&A expansion while AEM is negative at -4.60%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
2028.04%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -45.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
468.64%
SBC growth well above AEM's 4.76%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
264.57%
Well above AEM's 41.83% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-119.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AEM at -129.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while AEM is negative at -182.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1196.43%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AEM's 10372.38%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-185.37%
Negative yoy while AEM is 20258.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
0.04%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AEM's 1.97%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
99.89%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -10.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while AEM is negative at -81.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AEM is 6657.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-348.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -633.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.78%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -7.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-316.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -6120.32%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.