PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Net income growth similar to AEM's 176.06%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
3.19%
Less D&A growth vs. AEM's 15.37%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
0.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AEM's 1108.14%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
177.90%
SBC growth well above AEM's 1.20%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-55.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 338.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-509.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AEM at -92.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AEM's 174.22%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-101.84%
Negative yoy while AEM is 299.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
30.24%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AEM's 176.51%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-1.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -9.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases well above AEM's 80.03%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
70800.00%
Liquidation growth of 70800.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
16528.30%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -67.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1431.96%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -5.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
6.80%
Debt repayment well below AEM's 41.67%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.