PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.41%
Some net income increase while AEM is negative at -106.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.89%
D&A growth well above AEM's 2.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
344.84%
Some yoy growth while AEM is negative at -80.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.15%
SBC growth well above AEM's 0.16%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
140.47%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -549.97%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
496.51%
AR growth well above AEM's 361.15%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.63%
Some yoy usage while AEM is negative at -79.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-162.28%
Negative yoy while AEM is 109.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
34.67%
Some CFO growth while AEM is negative at -36.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.79%
CapEx growth well above AEM's 13.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AEM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AEM at -76.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
97.55%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -87.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
90.40%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -6.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -20063.35%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.