PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 8.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while AEM is 36.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
79.42%
SBC growth well above AEM's 74.21%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-482.86%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AEM is 289.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1119.88%
AR is negative yoy while AEM is 6138.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
117.96%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AEM's 1916.77%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-231.38%
Negative yoy AP while AEM is 92.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while AEM is negative at -252.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while AEM is negative at -606.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AEM's 93.88%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
84.87%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -23.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -2.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AEM is 163.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
We have some outflow growth while AEM is negative at -76.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
76.94%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AEM's 316.68%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AEM is 29.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Stock issuance far above AEM's 15.91%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.