PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 151.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.34%
D&A growth well above AEM's 11.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-70.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AEM stands at 12409.13%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AEM at -68.72%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Slight usage while AEM is negative at -151.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
186.50%
AR growth while AEM is negative at -100.60%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-274.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AEM at -105.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
5.27%
Lower AP growth vs. AEM's 527.64%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-33.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AEM at -39.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-55.38%
Negative yoy while AEM is 296.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while AEM is 24.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while AEM is negative at -39.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Some yoy expansion while AEM is negative at -90.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AEM is 10164.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
72.51%
We have mild expansions while AEM is negative at -173.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -23.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-69.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with AEM at -2.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.