PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.78%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
35.54%
Some D&A expansion while FNV is negative at -6.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
61.18%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FNV's 308.79%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -52.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-63.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -15.79%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -950.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-156.85%
Negative yoy while FNV is 3408.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
26.93%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FNV's 48.94%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-287.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while FNV stands at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.42%
Growth of 98.42% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
96.41%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -142.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.90%
Issuance growth of 168.90% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.