PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.02%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 560.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.50%
Negative yoy D&A while FNV is 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-900.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 104.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-55.35%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 9.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
204.75%
Well above FNV's 25.73% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-163.11%
Both negative yoy, with FNV at -822.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.42%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -6.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
62.15%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 93.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while FNV is negative at -9195.34%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while FNV is 13.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
5292.00%
Growth of 5292.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
140.21%
Investing outflow well above FNV's 160.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
95.53%
Buyback growth of 95.53% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.