PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.92%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -21.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
25.39%
Some D&A expansion while FNV is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-18.58%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 238.46%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.96%
SBC growth while FNV is negative at -11.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
212.61%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -223.61%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
112.46%
AR growth while FNV is negative at -146.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.99%
Growth well above FNV's 22.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
141.52%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. FNV's 32700.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
5.56%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -21.52%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
100.00%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 96.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5966.67%
Growth of 5966.67% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-54.27%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 136.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.