PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FNV's 12.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
66.29%
Some D&A expansion while FNV is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-104.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 205.88%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-72.78%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -7.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
854.67%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -110.59%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-85.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -70.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
AP growth of 209.23% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-3700.00%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-95.51%
Negative yoy while FNV is 91.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.62%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -13.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
99.88%
CapEx growth well above FNV's 37.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -10.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.43%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -22.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
91.50%
Debt repayment growth of 91.50% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.