PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.16%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 41.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
5.22%
D&A growth well above FNV's 1.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
262.53%
Some yoy growth while FNV is negative at -111.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-125.20%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -15.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
77.19%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -9100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-314.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -142.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.47%
AP growth of 236.47% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-244.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -36.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-132.63%
Negative yoy while FNV is 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
18.03%
Some CFO growth while FNV is negative at -16.95%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-648.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while FNV is 92.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.99%
We have some outflow growth while FNV is negative at -14.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-125.59%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 98.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-600.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.