PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 58.75%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.19%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 20.20%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
0.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FNV's 605.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
177.90%
SBC growth well above FNV's 8.33%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-55.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -402.86%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-509.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -572.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Some yoy usage while FNV is negative at -115.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-101.84%
Negative yoy while FNV is 105.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
30.24%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of FNV's 43.07%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-1.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -785.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
70800.00%
We have some liquidation growth while FNV is negative at -90.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
16528.30%
We have some outflow growth while FNV is negative at -178.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1431.96%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -928.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
6.80%
We repay more while FNV is negative at -18.75%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.