PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 11.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.46%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 2.68%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-25.34%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-31.81%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -23.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-645.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FNV is 90.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
52.36%
AR growth well above FNV's 17.57%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-335.70%
Negative yoy usage while FNV is 475.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
126.03%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -2100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.33%
Negative yoy CFO while FNV is 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-100.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while FNV is 97.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce yoy sales while FNV is 1140.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-220.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 258.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-143.26%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 99.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-69.38%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 13.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.