95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.64%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FNV's 63.03%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
3.23%
Less D&A growth vs. FNV's 9.00%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
99.10%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FNV's 1207.14%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
2335.70%
SBC growth of 2335.70% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
166.41%
Slight usage while FNV is negative at -955.56%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-45.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FNV at -421.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.29%
Growth well above FNV's 40.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
188.61%
Some yoy increase while FNV is negative at -70.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
50.27%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 41.28%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40106.50%
Liquidation growth of 40106.50% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-411.27%
We reduce yoy other investing while FNV is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
72265.38%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -518.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-103.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.