PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.33%
Negative yoy D&A while FNV is 1.58%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-14030.23%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-87.74%
Negative yoy SBC while FNV is 38.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.76%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FNV is 144.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
134.82%
AR growth well above FNV's 100.66%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FNV's 315.38%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-202.13%
Both negative yoy, with FNV at -462.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.83%
Negative yoy CFO while FNV is 16.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.30%
Some CapEx rise while FNV is negative at -1.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
129.23%
We have some liquidation growth while FNV is negative at -94.12%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
69.70%
We have some outflow growth while FNV is negative at -98.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
200.22%
We have mild expansions while FNV is negative at -17.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-91.19%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.