PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 33.07%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.88%
Some D&A expansion while FNV is negative at -94.80%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
58.43%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. FNV's 1682.35%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
33.34%
Less SBC growth vs. FNV's 133.33%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-161.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FNV is 205.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-146.54%
AR is negative yoy while FNV is 187.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.51%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-182.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -144.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-8516.17%
Negative yoy while FNV is 101.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while FNV is 34.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16744.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -170.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Purchases growth of 100.10% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
2516.86%
We have some liquidation growth while FNV is negative at -109.57%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
144.26%
Growth of 144.26% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-4026.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -412.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-0.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FNV is 99.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
932.90%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. FNV's 5412.69%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.