PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FNV at -5.09%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with FNV at -5.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-16.14%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-3.30%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FNV at -11.76%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-129.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FNV at -277.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-266.58%
AR is negative yoy while FNV is 25.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
172.76%
Inventory growth of 172.76% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
440.48%
AP growth of 440.48% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
110.07%
Some yoy usage while FNV is negative at -2061.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-44.47%
Negative yoy while FNV is 97.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-15.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FNV at -9.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -2.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while FNV stands at 81.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-16048.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -107.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.07%
Both yoy lines are negative, with FNV at -94.74%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
157.57%
Growth well above FNV's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-133.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -8.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
4.52%
Debt repayment growth of 4.52% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-92.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -100.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
92.39%
Buyback growth of 92.39% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.