PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
48.74%
Some net income increase while FNV is negative at -676.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
55.61%
D&A growth well above FNV's 1.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-167.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FNV stands at 581.22%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
50.53%
SBC growth while FNV is negative at -46.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
680.22%
Well above FNV's 323.33% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
109.57%
AR growth well above FNV's 154.50%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-364.99%
Negative yoy inventory while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-41.31%
Negative yoy AP while FNV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2108.31%
Growth well above FNV's 108.91%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-644.39%
Negative yoy while FNV is 397396.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x FNV's 22.96%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-396.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while FNV is 47.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-152781.91%
Negative yoy acquisition while FNV stands at 416.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.62%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. FNV's 88.87%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
35189753.73%
We have some liquidation growth while FNV is negative at -95.80%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-165.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with FNV at -409349.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-379.21%
We reduce yoy invests while FNV stands at 38.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
15.38%
Debt repayment growth of 15.38% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
2091.46%
Stock issuance far above FNV's 416.28%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
267.80%
Buyback growth of 267.80% while FNV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.